Calendar

08/13/2014

My Thoughts

The evidence of the merging of chromosomes is important in the worldview of humanistic evolution. This worldview points out that great apes have 48 chromosomes and humans have 46 chromosomes. With strong microscopes and their schooling they say there is evidence that appears to give testimony that two chromosomes in the human genome have merged together and therefore have produced a higher level of life.

It is important to realize that the humanistic evolutionary worldview puts scientists at the highest level of understanding and determination. Whatever a human scientist says, is their foundation for understanding. It seems to me a very prideful position to take, that they are the keepers of right and wrong thinking. (Christians believe this is a position held only by God.)

There is certainly the merging of chromosomes that can be observed in medicine today, but it's important to consider the outcome of the merging to get a complete picture. Whenever there is a merging of chromosomes it results in severe dysfunction or defect in a living body. Over 4000 diseases can be identified with the merging of chromosomes or mutations. (Only in Hollywood do mutations produce improvements, and maybe that's because they hold the humanistic evolutionary worldview and use movies to propagate the idea.)

What of our observational abilities:
I would also mention that a human observes that the sun 'moves' across the sky and 'to think otherwise would possibly think God is deceiving us.' This is the type of argument evolutionists hold with the chromosome idea. We know through the investigation, of Christian's who were scientists, that we live in a solar system, where the planets revolve around the sun. It is only due to our perspective as observers on the face of the earth that we observe things in a certain way. I say the same is true of all of our observations, and especially our cutting edge discoveries and therefore it is not that God is deceiving us if we observe something that might not make plain sense, it is only because we have yet to understand the full picture.

Think about that.

Love,
Dad

In addition to this, I've been thinking about how Humanistic Evolutionists never talk about the hard explanations of the diversity of life. They only point to similar creatures and try to craft their explanations around them, like the similarities of monkeys and humans or birds and possibly dinosaurs. BUT they need to come up with how all things came from the first spark of life. How is it that the butterfly and the blue whale came about, or what is the relation between the ostrich and the ant, or how about the puffer fish and how it's related to the giraffe?